The Post-Surge Plan

164 words.

A BBC headline (“US ‘must suspend’ Iraq withdrawal”) reminded me that we have yet to hear the most important part of the surge plan: What’s the plan now that the surge succeeded and the extra troops are leaving again? What have we gained if Iraq descends back into violence again? At that point, withdrawal isn’t a question of surrendering to terrorists, it’s a question of surrendering to incompetence in the Iraqi leadership. I realize we made the Iraqi mess and we’re still responsible on some level for cleaning it up, but we obviously can’t run their government for them. We’ve given them tons of opportunities to secure their own country and they’ve squandered it all. It looks like the only way to stabalize Iraq is a permanent occupying force, but the longer we stay, the more we’re resented. Yet when we start pulling troops out, Iraq quickly turns back into the Wild West and oil prices go up even more. What a crappy situation.

Related

This page is a static archival copy of what was originally a WordPress post. It was converted from HTML to Markdown format before being built by Hugo. There may be formatting problems that I haven't addressed yet. There may be problems with missing or mangled images that I haven't fixed yet. There may have been comments on the original post, which I have archived, but I haven't quite worked out how to show them on the new site.

Sorry, new comments are disabled on older posts. This helps reduce spam. Active commenting almost always occurs within a day or two of new posts.