Accuracy In Media Not So Accurate

Tom 209 words

My conscience dictates that I post this small retraction: Last week when I was rambling about Keith Olbermann, I linked to what I called an “interesting article” on Accuracy in Media (AIM) which suggested a link between the post-9/11 anthrax mailings and al Qaeda.

I’m always enthusiastic about finding new media watchdog blogs, so I eagerly added an Accuracy in Media feed to my news reader. Since then, I’ve been subjected to a non-stop stream of far-right rhetoric, which has prompted me to conclude that AIM isn’t so much interested in “accuracy in media” as it is “accurate representation of far-right ideology in media.”

This is basically the same problem I experienced with the similarly far-left rhetoric of Media Matters. So I’ve deleted Accuracy in Media from my news reader (as I did Media Matters) and I hereby retract any previous implication that AIM might contain factual information. I heartily apologize to anyone who may have stumbled onto AIM through my earlier post, and if you are currently reading AIM to stay informed, I urge you to seek professional help in reversing the brainwashing you are being exposed to.

That is all.

Thomas Krehbiel writes The Krehbiel Strikes Back, a generally centrist commentary on news, media, politics, and culture.

Originally posted on my personal blog which was active from 2003 to 2020. You may have arrived here by redirection from the original permalink.

Elsewhere: Loading...

Sorry, new comments are disabled on older posts. This helps reduce spam. Active commenting almost always occurs within a day or two of new posts.