Cartoon Intifada Part Of The Project?

14 February, 2006. 460 words.

Warning: If you are already bummed about where the world is heading, do not read this.

First of all, this is just plain wrong: Hamas sends preschoolers out to burn Danish flags. Hamas organized a demonstration against Denmark with school children? WTF? And even more wrong is this implication: Hamas has schools??

And now for the really disturbing stuff.

In The Cartoon Jihad, Olivier Guitta reiterates how the Muslim Brotherhood orchestrated the Cartoon Intifada. No surprise there. He then goes on to explain how the Cartoon Intifada fits neatly into their plans for worldwide domination. Wha? Huh? Worldwide domination? Maybe this is common knowledge to other folks, but it’s the first I’ve heard about these plans. I read on with great interest about this Muslim Brotherhood. Guitta writes about a document titled “The Project,” found in a raid on a Swiss villa, which outlines “a roadmap for achieving the installation of Islamic regimes in the West via propaganda, preaching, and, if necessary, war.”

Thus, “The Project” calls for “putting in place a watchdog system for monitoring the [Western] media to warn all Muslims of the dangers and international plots fomented against them.” Another long-term effort is to “put in place [among Muslims in the West] a parallel society where the group is above the individual, godly authority above human liberty, and the holy scripture above the laws.”

Gulp.

I hasten to add that the Muslim Brotherhood appears to be an ultra-conservative subset of the Muslim community. Sort of like The 700 Club for Islam. I mention that to remind myself of the mantra that “not all Muslims are bad, not all Muslims are bad.”

Unfortunately, the somewhat wacko Muslim Brotherhood has been growing steadily since it was founded in 1928, and now has ties all over the world, including America, in the form of the lobbyist organization CAIR (Council on American-Islamic Relations) and the Muslim American Society. (Note how there is surprisingly little information on MAS in Wikipedia, and certainly nothing to connect them with the Muslim Brotherhood or The Project.)

Now before you panic too much, there is some controversy over the veracity of “The Project.” For example, Yusuf Smith refutes it in “The Project”: the latest conspiracy theory. Smith writes: “It seems that only one copy of the document has ever been found anywhere, namely at Mr. Nada’s villa; Nada denies that it is Brotherhood policy or that he is its author, claiming that it was written by researchers he refused to name, and said that he agrees with 15 to 20% of the document’s content.”

I’m not quite ready to decide about “The Project” yet. But I will say that strategically speaking, it sounds like a really good-and feasible-infiltration plan that takes full advantage of Western tolerance.

Related