Christianists

116 words.

I came across the article, Onward, Christianist soldiers?, by Ruth Walker of the Christian Science Monitor today, after I saw a reference to the word “Christianist” on a liberal blog. It’s a good read. The term is very appropriate, too. During the recent Book of Daniel Incident, I’ve noticed that the word “Christian” is quickly becoming a derogatory term in this country, and I’ve often been annoyed at being put under a blanket label of “those stupid Christians” by people of the liberal persuasion. “Christianist” is much more appropriate, and I think I’ll start using it from now on. Just like Osama is an “Islamist fundamental,” Pat Roberson will henceforth be known as a “Christianist fundamental.”

Related

This page is a static archival copy of what was originally a WordPress post. It was converted from HTML to Markdown format before being built by Hugo. There may be formatting problems that I haven't addressed yet. There may be problems with missing or mangled images that I haven't fixed yet. There may have been comments on the original post, which I have archived, but I haven't quite worked out how to show them on the new site.

Sorry, new comments are disabled on older posts. This helps reduce spam. Active commenting almost always occurs within a day or two of new posts.